The transgender movement has made a lot of fuss lately about “misgendering” people. That is, not calling someone by their “preferred pronouns”. Setting aside that whole issue for a moment, I thought it would be fun to look at God’s “preferred pronouns”.
How does God describe Himself?
Not once in the entire Bible is God referred to as feminine.
Not one single time.
Not even once.
God is always a Father (but never a mother) and Jesus was obviously male. The pronouns used for God are always masculine, never feminine, and even The name of God (Yahweh, or Yehowah) is a masculine word.
Sometimes God uses feminine analogies, but so does Paul and we all agree he wasn’t a woman.
But isn’t the Holy Spirit Feminine in the Old Testament?
Grammatically, yes the Hebrew word for spirit “רוּחַ” (ruach) is a feminine word.
However, there’s a complication from the Hebrew Language itself.
Hebrew is a fully gendered language, meaning every single word in Hebrew is always grammatically either feminine or masculine. Unlike English and Greek, there are no “neuter” words.
For example, in English we have he, she, and it for pronouns (Greek is similar). “He” is obviously male and “she” obviously female, but “it” can be neither male or female. Hebrew doesn’t have any gender neutral words like “it”. (many modern languages are also this way, such as French)
Therefore, in Hebrew everything – even inanimate objects like tables, chairs, or books – are always grammatically either “he” or “she”; but never “it”.
Obviously, books have no gender.
However in Hebrew, grammatically they must have a gender. No Hebrew speaker would think a table, chair, or book was a man or woman, even though the language forces you to say it is.
Further, some words are always feminine or always masculine regardless of any other elements.
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit (ruach, a feminine word) of God was moving over the surface of the waters.
Yes, it’s a feminine word. However, ruach – the Hebrew word for spirit – is always a feminine word and never a masculine word, even when applied to males. For example:
27 When they told him all the words of Joseph that he had spoken to them, and when he saw the wagons that Joseph had sent to carry him, the spirit (ruach, a feminine word) of their father Jacob revived.
You wouldn’t use this passage to argue that Jacob was a woman would you?
Of course not!
You would look to the subject of the sentence (Jacob) to get the proper gender. That’s because while ruach is technically feminine, it can’t confer gender because it can’t exist as a masculine word.
However, Hebrew proper names can always exist as either masculine or feminine, and thus always determine gender.
God’s proper name “יְהוָֹה” YHWH, typically – and probably incorrectly – pronounced “Yahweh” is a proper name, and therefore can be either masculine or feminine to indicate gender.
God’s proper name (YHWH) is always masculine every time it’s used; it is never feminine (not even once).
Also, Hebrew pronouns can be either masculine or feminine and thus be used to determine gender. Every time a pronoun is used for God, it’s always masculine.
Hebrew is different than English. However, even with the differences there isn’t a single place where God is referred to in the feminine.
Not even once.
But what about the New Testament?
The Greek word for Spirit is “πνεῦμα” (pneuma), which is always grammatically a neuter word (like the Hebrew word is always feminine). It never has a masculine or feminine form and thus can’t be used to determine gender.
Obviously Jesus was a male, and equally obvious is the imagery of “The Father” being masculine. Further, despite not being able to glean anything from the Greek word for spirit (pneuma), there is a place where the “gender” of the Holy Spirit is directly stated by Jesus.
John 16:13 (Please note, Jesus is speaking)
13 But when He (masculine pronoun), the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own (masculine reflexive pronoun) initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.
So that leaves us with one conclusion:
Never – not even once – is The Father, The Son, or the Holy Spirit referred to as feminine in the entire Bible.
He (God) just isn’t.
Therefore we can be sure that God definitely wants us to see Him as masculine. The entire Bible bears this out by its 100% consistent use of masculine words when describing God.
“But maybe that’s just ‘The Patriarchy’ making God look Masculine“
I mentioned the above to someone one time, and their response was saying that’s because all the writers were men, so they made God male. They argued it was part of the “evil” patriarchy and couldn’t be trusted because there was male bias.
The problem with that statement is it’s self-contradicting.
Either the Bible is a trustworthy source of information about God or it isn’t.
- If the Bible is a trustworthy source of information about God, then we can believe it when it only uses masculine pronouns for God.
- If the Bible isn’t trustworthy source of information about God, then why do we even care what it says?
You can’t have it both ways.
If “The Patriarchy” messed with the Bible, then it’s not trustworthy because it’s been messed with and can be safely ignored. If the Bible hasn’t been “messed with”, then we can take it at its word.
An (unfortunately necessary) addendum: Yes, women absolutely are created in the Image of God.
Some Christians – when the learn that God always identifies as masculine – begin to think only men are created in the image of God. They often say that man was created in God’s image, but woman is only “indirectly” created in God’s image (because she was taken out of/made from man, who is in God’s image).
To be clear: yes I believe women were created “Imago Dei” (in the image of God) because the Scriptures are clear on this point. There are only three verses in the whole Bible where “in the image of God” comes up.
We’ll look at each in turn.
Before we look at the first, I need to mention something. In Genesis 1:27, there is a Hebrew definite article (equivalent to our English word “the”) omitted by most translators. You can double check me in an interlinear Bible here.
I have inserted it below.
26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
27 God created [the] man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
This verse doesn’t explicitly say that women are created in the image of God. However, the phrase “male and female He created them” does clearly imply it. Even more clear is when God says “let them rule”. Them, being plural; i.e. Adam and Eve.
When read in Hebrew with the definite article (“the“), some Christians say that only Adam was made in the image of God. However, they ignore the word “them” in verse 26 and also the following verse to make that assertion.
The next verse is even more clear.
1 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God.
2 He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created.
God named the entire human race “man”. “Man” is the proper/correct name of the human race as decreed by God. Verse 2 clearly says that God named them (plural) man. Man (including both men and women) were created in the image of God according to verse 1.
Therefore women are created in the image of God.
(It’s even more clear if you check the original Hebrew. I’ll omit that now for space’s sake though.)
There’s only one more verse some people use to argue women aren’t created in the image of God. It is:
1 Corinthians 11:7
7 For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.
There is a direct contrasting statement being made here. Men are the “image and glory of God” but woman is “the glory of man”. However, Paul doesn’t explicitly say women aren’t made in the image of God. You could argue it’s implied, but not in the face of Genesis 5 (which we just looked at).
So yes, women are definitely made in the image of God (shocker right? 😉 )
But that begs an interesting question:
If both men and women are made in the image of God, why is God always portrayed as masculine?
I’m not God, so I honestly don’t know.
I have several suspicions – some of them strong – but nothing I’m willing to commit to immortality on the internet. God chose to reveal Himself as masculine, and I’m willing to accept that He had a very good reason even if I don’t know what it is.
That said, both men and women display aspects of God’s character in their natures. I could spend a long time unpacking that, but we probably already agree so I won’t make this article unnecessarily long.
God The Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are always presented as masculine, 100% of the time with no exceptions. Therefore – whatever His reasons – God has chosen to reveal Himself exclusively as masculine.
I trust He has a good reason for doing so.
That said, Both men and women display aspects of God’s character in their natures. (Though again, I won’t go into that here.)