Last update: July 6th
As the title says, this article will let everyone know what I’m working on and approximately how close new articles are to being released. Sometimes I get a bug about something and write/publish a whole article in a few days, but it’ll usually show up here before publishing.
Also, if you have a request for an article topic, please leave it in the comments below. I may or may not write it, but the odds are much higher if you suggest it. I make no promises though.
Change log:
- July 6th: On the 4th of July, I published the article on how Jesus freed us from Satan’s tyranny (No, that’s not a coincidence 😉 ) Patrons got it July 4th, it will be published publicly on July 11th. Updated the description for the the article on “linguistic warfare” below. Added an article on if Jesus’s death was necessary to forgive sins to the working articles list.
- June 9th: I published the article on what ransom and redemption mean to patrons; it will be published publicly on June 16th. Added a working article about “linguistic warfare”, and one about real, biblical spiritual warfare.
- May 7th: Yesterday, I published to patrons the article that’s a mid-series recap and it also explains a reason that Jesus had to die that isn’t PSA, though it doesn’t directly conflict with PSA either. It will be published publicly on May 13th. I’ve updated the working articles accordingly.
Articles on which I’m currently working
To be clear, I only actively work on a few at a time, the rest get the short end of the stick. However, I thought you all might like to see what I’m working on, so here’s a list. 🙂 It’s not a complete list, but these are the major ones.
“Working” articles (In rough order of priority)
- Recognizing Linguistic warfare. Often, the very words and phrases we use to discuss the gender/sexual debate subconsciously cede the debate through the very words/phrases themselves. That is, the words/phrases themselves assume that the false position is correct. We’ll take a look at this. This will be an odd article for me since I’ll cite very little scripture, but I think it’s important to recognize this when we engage in debate and defend the faith. Currently, it’s very close to completion and I’ll likely publish it in the next week or two.
- Article Series — The Biblical case for AND against Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) This is something of an offshoot from my article about ignored reasons that Jesus died. I’ve had doubts about PSA ever since I read Ezekiel 18 many years ago, and other passages give me pause as well. It will take many articles to unpack completely and I have a rough outline in my intro to the PSA article series.
- Real Spiritual Warfare (Christus Victor). This was originally part of the article on ransom and redemption. It shows just how bad spiritual warfare is, and consequently, how amazing it is that Jesus rescued us from it. It doesn’t bear directly on PSA per se, but it’s directly related to the idea of ransom and redemption, which we already examined.
- Did Jesus have to die before God could forgive sins? Matthew says that Jesus’s blood was poured out “for the forgiveness of sins”, so the answer would seem obvious. However, the Greek word can mean other things and Jesus Himself used it in Luke 4:19 (twice) to describe why He came, and it doesn’t have to do with forgiveness at all. This will be another “word study” article and the next in the PSA series.
- Does Isaiah 53 support PSA? This will be a verse-by-verse walk through the end of Isaiah 52 and all of Isaiah 53.
- The Early Church Fathers on Penal Substitutionary Atonement (with quotes). This is part of the PSA series. Some say that the early church had never heard of PSA, some say they it was the only thing they taught. I will examine this in exhaustive (and likely exhausting) detail. (Update: there’s a large element of ignoring context, ignoring the author’s other works, and even some downright deceptive practices by the source most PSA guys use.)
- Is Peter the foundation of the (Catholic) Church? I had completely forgotten about this draft until recently. The passage that Catholics use to support the idea of Papal infallibility is Matthew 16, but the Greek grammar actually makes it impossible that Peter is the foundation of the church.
- Does the Mosaic Law still apply? What about mixed fabrics? Sex during Mensuration? The 10 Commandments? Suggested in the comments. No idea when I’ll get to it, but it’s on the list. 🙂
- Revelation Part 2: The Millennial Kingdom, The Rapture, etc. This would be a follow-up to my article on Revelation, covering the things that one didn’t.
- The BOS Bible. Okay, this technically isn’t an article, but I have an ongoing project to translate the New Testament from Greek to English. You can read what’s done so far (~70% of the NT by word count, just Luke, Acts, and Revelation to go.) here: BOS Bible.com. I’m almost halfway through Luke as of November 2024, and I’m aiming to translate a chapter a week.
“Back Burner” articles. (I’ll probably get to them eventually, but they’re low priority right now.)
- The Masoretic Text (MT) vs the Septuagint (LXX) vs Dead Sea Scrolls. This would be a companion article to my article on New Testament textual criticism, this time looking at the Old Testament.
- Was Paul Always Single, Or Was He A Widower? Surprisingly, I think there’s solid evidence from the Bible itself that Paul was married at some point. His wife probably died, or possibly divorced him after he became a Christian, but that Paul was a widower seems most likely.
- Biblically, What’s the Role of Men in Society and Marriage? This one has been mostly complete for rather a long time, but something about it just feels “off”. I don’t want to publish something that I can’t fully stand behind, so it’s been sitting for a while.
- Random other ones. I have a few dozen article drafts right now, mostly stubs or reminders to write articles on said topics. If you see something I’ve said I would write about that’s not on either list above, that’s probably where it is.
Prayer Requests
Yes, I’m shamelessly asking for prayer.
- My outreach. I have an outreach to unbelievers that’s anonymous so I won’t share any details, but please pray for it to be high-quality and effective in softening hearts towards God.
- My finances. Money has gotten a little tight lately, partially because of inflation and also because a ton of unexpected, “out of the blue” expenses have been hitting non-stop the last few months. Please pray for provision.
Thank you for praying, and may God bless you richly for it.
God Bless,
Berean Patriot
 – Request Article topics Here!){kind=link}
I can’t wait for what is betrothal in the bible article, I hope you will address song of songs book more deeper Amen.
I will. 🙂 Actually, that’s part of the reason I’m writing it.
Thank you I will wait.
I would love your opinion on the real meaning and extent of the 10 commandments. Does not bearing false witness against your neighbor mean only as a witness in a trial or also lying? Does honor in honoring your parents mean the same thing as today or does it mean supporting them when they can’t work? Is not taking the name of god in vain about oaths, or something else? Does not making graven images mean we cannot have statues even if they are just for decoration?
And following that, why appears to be a different set of commandments in the bible different from the first one? I guess it has to do with differences on what the covenant with Israel really required, but it’s not clear at all to me. Is the covenant with Israel just the 10 commandments? then what about the rest of the laws in the Torah? Were there different covenants overlapping?
Sorry if you already touched some of the topics, I’m just sharing what I’ve been thinking lately.
your entire patriarchy theology has exploded, more people are learning what God actually says while you here are fringe that teaches illogical heresies. You are accountable for the damage you cause.
I’ve got a question that I’ve wrestled with for a while. The question on the surface is somewhat straightforward, but the implications are rather large. Let me explain.
Ezekiel 18:6, 22:10
Leviticus 15:19-30; 20:18
Leviticus 18:19
These verses make it pretty clear to not have intercourse with a woman during menstration. I separated Leviticus 18:19 because this one puts that in the same list as things like adultery and homosexuality, both very serious sins.
It appears to me, from the above verses, that we shouldn’t be doing intercourse during that time of the month, yet popular teachers encourage it. Basically the “law has passed away” and such. If that argument is true, then you could use that same argument to allow adultery and homosexuality as well.
Here is a popular pastor and an example:
https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/is-sex-during-menstruation-sinful
Further points. Jesus turns people out of heaven for being “anomia”. My understanding is “lawless”. Matthew 7:23. Wouldn’t this quantify as a lawless sort of sin? This whole idea of “freedom in Christ” and “we are under a new covenant” is a potentially dangerous message if we just throw the law out and ignore it.
Basically, the issue I am brining up started with the Menstration and Sex issue, but its much larger than that. How much and what of the OT laws still apply today? My basic understanding today is the moral code of the OT still applies, but all the rituals and rites are all covered under Christ. But, if my understanding is correct, then we shouldn’t be having sex during menstration.
Anyhow, this is a large question in my opinion, and one I personally think is important when considering the threat of Matthew 7. The full question is “how much of the OT still applies today?” Answering that question will answer the menstration question as well.
That’s a very good question, and the second one I’ve received on the OT law on this post. I added it to the article list, and I did a little looking and I think it’ll be a fun article to research/write. 🙂
Article idea: a detailed look at the Schmittian Exception and whether it applies to biblical law.
Thanks for making this communication page available. Some articles are just interesting, but others might hold a higher priority on the scale of importance. For instance, I would think that the third article you mentioned, the reasons Jesus died, would hold a higher place of priority than mixed fabrics. If people are getting the gospel wrong, that should be at the top of the list.
One suggestion for a new article – Covering the present tense of the word “Believe” in John 3:16 and other places where the tense indicates repeated and continuous action, instead of a one time event – and what that means concerning salvation. Thanks.
Agreed about priority. I made a small edit to make that clear. And BTW, the reason the article about the gospel isn’t #1 is because of a large surge in people here wanting to say that sex outside of marriage is morally acceptable. Obviously I have a problem with that and I want to cover the resources that aren’t commonly available online. The article about the gospel is more a matter of focus, and when I publish it, it should be extra obvious why the two that are above it in the queue are higher priority.
I think your point about present participles actually might fit into the gospel article. Hmm…
Get a sleep apnea study done in order to rule out a simple sleep machine giving you better sleep hence more sleep.
Could you do a in-depth article on “Spiritual Promptings” and things relating to claiming to have messages or direction from GOD in areas of our lives? Particularly when asking questions about “who should I marry?” “Is This Thought from GOD?”
Honestly, probably not. Not because I don’t want to, but because this is something I’ve wrestled with for many years and don’t have a satisfying conclusion. I will say that I think it’s a good idea to be extremely careful. I know several people who thought God had told them something, started to build their life around it, and then when it didn’t happen they were devastated. Some even effectively left the faith. Conversely, I do know one woman who said she heard a nearly audible voice tell her that she would marry someone, and she’s now been married to that man for quite some years.
So, yeah; I don’t know how to advise someone except to say that you should be very careful about this. I absolutely believe that God still talks to people these days, but — like biblical times — there are a lot of (sometimes accidental) false prophets. The one additional warning I’ll give is related to Bethel church; I recommend you stay far away from them. Mike Winger on YouTube has some great videos about them if you think they aren’t terrible.
Prayed for you, God Bless you. I’ve already commented a request under your post about masturbation and fantasy (The one talking about Romans 1, where Paul says homosexuality is unnatural), but I’ll comment my request again here:
Do you plan on writing an article that How Greek sexual purity got adopted by Christianity and how they thought not having sex meant you were more holy? It’s not too difficult to find a ton of articles and academic papers online that discuss it, but it’s usually very fragmented. You usually need look at a wide variety of sources.
I really appreciate the prayers. 🙂
I also think I missed your previous comment somehow. Sorry about that. You might want to read my article on homosexuality for obvious reasons. It doesn’t touch on the “unnatural” aspect the way you asked about it, but there’s more going on in Romans 1 than most Christians know.
About how the Greek gnostic ideas about sexual purity infiltrated the Church, I probably won’t write an article about that. There are scholarly sources that have already covered it and I didn’t save any notes from when I was doing the research, or even any titles of what I read, so I would be starting at square one again. Further, I prefer not to cover topics that have been well-covered by others. I prefer to spend time on the less common topics about which there isn’t much info (or isn’t much good/complete info).
You’re probably aware of the modern Christian movement known as Hebrew roots: Christians who believe keeping Torah is necessary. I see that you’re planning an article on that subject and I look forward to it. I know some Christians who keep Torah and I completely respect their reasoning. But I wanted to point out a disturbing sect that’s adjacent to Hebrew Roots being ones that have concluded that Paul was a false Apostle. There is a lot online on the subject but one book I’ve seen circulating is “Yeshua and The Law vs Paul the False Apostle”. I don’t know if this would fit your area of expertise but I’d be interested to see your take on it.
I’m new to your work so maybe you’ve already covered this but I’d love to see a single comprehensive article on all the Biblical support for Patriarchy and male headship and what it all means. Again maybe you’ve already covered that.
If someone rejects Paul, he’d have to reject everyone who accepted Paul, which includes Peter, John, James, Luke/Acts, and of course the Gospel of Mark was Peter’s gospel written down by Mark. That means your entire New Testament is reduced to Matthew and Jude, and maybe Hebrews if don’t think Paul wrote it. (My suspicion is that it was Paul’s teaching written down by someone else, no idea who. That’s only a suspicion though.) So by process of elimination, you basically don’t have a New Testament if you reject Paul. Now that I think about it, that might be a fun article stub.
As for your other question, I would recommend my series on marriage. Please, don’t skip the prologue article though.
Thank you for your articles. I’ve found them helpful and have recommended them.
I’ve asked you before if you’ve read Thelyphthora … female ruin… (long title shortened to the googlable bits) by Martin Madan. I’m on volume 3 now. It is infuriating how such a text so well argued so long ago was so thoroughly quashed.
It pains me to see that just about every Christian sect is strictly monogamous and the ones that border into antichrist cults smear popular opinion of the practice of polygyny.
This may seem out of left field as far as articles go, but I would like to see the talents of your mind applied to Jeroboam the King of the North of Israel, his grievous error, and how that may apply to the organized church today if at all.
One more recommendation for a future article. I’m finding confusion among believers about scriptures in the New Testament that pertain to salvation, and those that pertain to discipleship – the sanctification/discipleship process that takes place in a believer’s life AFTER salvation. For example, “Make Jesus Lord of your life” is used at altar calls to get people to come forward for salvation, but that’s works, part of the sanctification and discipleship process AFTER we believe and are born again. Rom. 10:9 says we “confess”, but the “making” of it is a work that occurs AFTER we believe and are born again at a particular moment. That’s what I mean. Thanks for your time.
That’s actually something I’ll touch on rather heavily (though not quite directly) in the article about the two most important and ignored reasons that Jesus died. 🙂
Please write an article on the rest of Revelations
I added it to the list. 🙂
I would like an article on the Talmudists and their relation to the Pharisees. The bible has a lot to say on them, such as Revelations 2:9/3:9, Acts mentioning the Star of Remphan and Tabernacle of Moloch, the history of the so-called Star of David, as well as how Ephesians Chapter 6 mentioning the “principalities of darkness” ruling over us isn’t metaphorical, but literal.
Also, sorry to hear about your friend, and prayers to you and your friend. I’ll pray for you and your sleep as well as your outreach going well.
I am wide awake at 4AM 🤣
I decided to look up the word married/Marriage in the Greek and Hebrew and have discovered multiple different words. It’s confusing, frustrating and enlightening. It’s almost as of marriage is a little more complicated and yet very simplified in this way. My goal was the find a common word like ISH or BAAL is common for MAN/HUSBAND anyway I think you get my point. Thoughts or helpful ideas?
Welcome to the Hebrew language. It tends to be like this whenever you look up a word or idea, and Hebrew often has multiple words with the difference being nuance and their meanings overlapping. Ba’al (not to be confused with the pagan god) usually means “master”, “owner”, or “husband”, since those ideas have an enormous amount of overlap in Hebrew. In fact, in Deut 22:22, you have “If a man is found lying with a married woman”, but more literally it’s “If a man is found lying with a woman owned/married to an owner/husband. (see the link in my response to your following comment) Ish simply means a man, whether married or unmarried, and in fact is translated “husband” not-infrequently. So yes, Hebrew is a bit of a linguistic “mess” compared to Greek.
One thing that will help you wrap your mind around Hebrew is to understand that most Hebrew words aren’t about abstract definitions, but rather pictorial and symbolic. For example, one of the words translated sin/iniquity literally means “crookedness”, and can refer to the consequences of a man’s crookedness. This explains why it’s also used to describe a man’s back and roads in addition to sin/iniquity. So while Greek does have abstract meanings, Hebrew words are more often about the pictorial aspect and the word’s meaning flows from that.
It also seems that most of the usage of marriage is a one sided action on the man’s part to “take or make” (a woman) their wife. I found the wor nasa in 2 Chronicles 11:21.
way-yiq-qah is the verb to take in Gen 24:67 by Issac taking Rebecca.
You’re not wrong about “taking” a wife. I do actually talk about why this is on my article: What is Betrothal in the Bible? Is it the Same as Modern Engagement?
This is a very small topic so I’m not hopeful you’ll write on the topic soon, but here it goes anyway: The Bible clearly outlines punishments for different sins. However, there are certain times when a person might be responsible for the sins of others, as in this passage:
EZEKIEL 3:18 ‘When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand.’
What did the phrase “requiring of blood” mean in this passage? Did it imply that the person would receive the same punishment as the wicked man, or was it only something to be ashamed of?
It really helps if you read it in context, and especially with Ezekiel 33:1-9. The watchman analogy in Ezekiel 33 really clears this up. If a watchman sees an army coming and doesn’t warn the people, the watchman is guilty of the people’s blood because it was his job to warn them and he didn’t. But if he warns them and they don’t care, the watchman did his duty and he is blameless. God said that He called Ezekiel as a watchman for Israel, hence 3:18. (which is restated almost word-for-word in Ez 33). Let me point out that this is specific for Ezekiel and his calling. You can argue that it applies elsewhere (like watchmen and perhaps those similar to watchmen), but it doesn’t make one man guilty of another man’s sins.
Ezekiel chapter 18 makes is very clear that one man is never held responsible for another man’s sins.
Yeah I guess that makes a lot of sense. Thanks for taking the time to respond!
You’re welcome. 🙂
Thank you, for giving us help with reviewing bible versions. I’ve been using KJV, but wanted to try a more current word-for-word option. I have a “GOD’s WORD” bible, but am finding it totally different to the KJV. I am purchasing a NASB95 as my main go-to bible, but would like your view of the GW bible.
You’re welcome. 🙂 To answer your question, somewhat impressively it actually passes the litmus test verse. Even more shocking, it actually gets 1 Thess 4:4… well, not right since they go gender neutral, but righter than many translations. (Details about what the verse means in my article on betrothal) That said, it’s so far from literal that it shouldn’t be considered for serious study. It also goes the gender-neutral route, again marking it as entirely unsuitable.
If society adopts polygyny and a strict no sex outside of marriage law, how will you deal with the massive surplus of young men who will be left without a wife and shut out of access to sex?
🙄
Request #1: How to find a sound and loving church (and maybe some church suggestions, or directories if that isn’t too much??) and what to do in the meantime. Things to look for, things to look out for, as in, red flags. I don’t just want a church with a correct statement of faith and beliefs, but one that is loving and has a heart for the growing of the Christian
Request #2: Women’s roles in the local church. I’m not sure if you’ve mentioned this before, but what have you come to understand about what a woman can do in the church?
To request #1, I’m afraid I don’t have a lot of advice on picking a church. There are a few things to look for that will help. First, do they allow female elders, pastors, and/or deacons? That should remove a church from the running immediately. Other than that, I would see if the church has a website with a statement of beliefs. However, while you can know if a church is bad using those metrics, it doesn’t really tell you if it’s good. You’ll simply need to visit them one-by-one. I compiled a list of churches and visited one a week until I’d worked through all of them. I don’t enjoy the process, but I haven’t found a better way. It helps if there’s a bible study or prayer meeting on Sunday before or after the service because that can help you get a better sense of the place. A one-week visit should help eliminate many of them. Once you have a “short list”, you could even listen to some of their sermons if they’re recorded. That’ll help give you an idea of the teaching.
Good signs are multiple pastors of roughly equal authority and verse-by-verse teaching through the Bible/a book of the Bible. A huge red flag is a church — especially a small church — that is built around a single “cult of personality” type leader. Most importantly, pray. Pray about it and get those you know praying about it. I’m not sure I have much more advice than that, so I probably won’t write a full-length article about it.
To Request #2, I do actually have an article that touches on that quite extensively. It’s this article from my series on marriage. I recommend you read it from the beginning (second link) though the best place to start is a “prologue” that I wrote later, link here.
Commenting this here instead of your Blog post about Betrothal or the one about Masturbation. I think it’s related to my previous comment about natural intercourse and the comment might be article material.
The academic journal article “Can a Man Commit Porneia with his wife” states that Paul says in 1st Thesalonians 4:3-6 that someone can commit Porneia with his wife. The article argues that Paul was stating that man should “acquire”(can mean to own sexually) have his “vessel”( can mean wife) in honor and holiness and not in “passion of desire” like the Gentiles. The heavy implication of this being that Paul thinks that it’s’ possible to commit porneia with his wife by having sex out of passion or lustful desire. Paul contrasts sex between Christians with that of the Gentiles. Very possibly that means engaging in non procreative sex, as Paul saying having passionate and lustful sex and that what Gentiles engage in is bad sound very similar to what Greco Roman philosophers said. The evidence the journal gives is is based on how the Hebrew word כלי is used in 2nd Temple Judaism usage of and the way 1 Peter 3:7 used the Greek word σκεῦος. Also that in 1 Thessalonians 4:4 the word Greek word κτάομαι can mean to “win for oneself)
Here’s the article in question(Thessalonians is talked about in “Πορνεῖα in the New Testament”) : https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/items/2d0c5f8a-0012-43ac-a555-683067d89b4d
Do you think the topic of whether or not Paul and other New Testament writers heavily promoted Platonic Sex values and that there was a “wrong” type of sex in marriage is worth making an article for? I’ve also heard the suggestion that the sex the Gentiles engaged in 1 Thessalonians 4:3-6 was referring to Temple Prostitution.
Your Article about Betrothal seems more to fall in line with the Journal article I’ve posted(since you support the claim that 1 Peter 3:7’s usage of acquire has sexual implications). I’m still very confused about how you can say it’s okay for Christians to masturbate, with the information you, and the journal article I’ve posted provide. If we as Christians need to have our own wife AND have them in holiness unlike the Gentiles doing impurity, how can masturbation fit into any of that? (That sex outside of marriage is bad,) (usage of the term acquire in particular). Then again, if the Song of Solomon is what’s considered “holy” than I’m probably overreacting. Forgive me if I’ve put a stumblingblock in front of anyone who’s read your articles or if I’m twisting scripture, I’m more or less asking for your opinion
I disagree with the basic supposition that “acquire” can mean to “own” (or possess) sexually there because of the Greek tense. There would be a solid case if κτάομαι was in the perfect tense there, but it’s not. It means to “acquire” in the tense used there, not to own/possess. Thus, I don’t see how it can apply to marriage. (though there are sexual activities that the Bible clearly prohibits in marriage; more on that in a moment.). The whole points seems to be about a betrothal, contrasting paying for a prostitute in verse 3 with acquiring a wife in verse 4.
I utterly reject the idea that, as you said: “The heavy implication of this being that Paul thinks that it’s’ possible to commit porneia with his wife by having sex out of passion or lustful desire.“. As you mentioned, Song of Solomon seems to make this interpretation utterly absurd. It also makes the notion of Platonic love absurd within a marriage. So do verses like Proverbs 5:19 with phrases like “Let her breasts satisfy you at all times; Be exhilarated always with her love“. That doesn’t sound very platonic, does it?
Okay, on to “pornea” inside of marriage. Romans 1:26 speaks of anal sex between men and women (it’s not about two women, see my article on homosexuality for evidence), which you could argue would be pornea because it’s both (1) sexual, and (2) immoral. I make a similar argument regarding sexual denial in my article on divorce.
Now to masturbation, do you consider it “sex outside of marriage”? If so, why? (The idea of “sex outside of marriage” is more accurately “sex with another person outside of marriage”.)
Thank you for your response, you’ve made pretty good arguments against my original comment, I’ll answer your last question anyway to continue discussion. (also, yeah, not worth making and article for)
I think masturbation without a spouse would technically count as sex outside of marriage because it is, quite literally, sex being done outside the context of marriage. Also, what do you mean by “sex with ANOTHER PERSON outside of marriage” as opposed to just no sex period before marriage?
Although, if I’m wrong about my first statement, I don’t think Masturbation would be considered sex outside of marriage if done by itself(especially after reading your response), it’s more like if would be done either fantasizing about a real person, then that would probably count as sex outside of marriage(you’ve made an article talking about why that’s bad). However, you’ve argued that using fantasy that follows criteria set by the Song of Solomon, is okay for masturbation. If you have to actually be married to someone before you have sex with them, why would fantasizing about fictional settings not be considered “sex with another person outside of marriage” as opposed to real people? What makes non marital masturbation to reality as opposed to fiction? If you’re not actually married to a fake character, I’m not sure it counts as sex within
marriage. I was also thinking about how masturbation can be lustful like how I was attempting to
argue in my previous comment.
I wanted to say I apologize for saying something very wrong without considering the evidence and I thank you for responding to me with evidence.
If you want me to make more comments in another article(if the reply chain becomes too long for the request article) to prevent this from being off topic I can.
So, the Bible never addresses masturbation directly. There’s a tangential connection, as I mention in my article on porn, fantasy, and masturbation, but nothing else. The various words and descriptions in the Bible always require two participants, not just one. Given that, applying the label “sex” to masturbation simply isn’t supported by the Bible. Modern definitions, sure; but not biblical ones. At least, I’ve found no mention of it in the Bible.
To the fantasy aspect, I covered that in detail in the article above. Fantasizing about another person doesn’t mean that there are two participants though. Definitionally, physically, and literally, there’s still only one person involved. The problem in fantasy lies that it can — not necessarily does, but can — cross the line into coveting, which is a sin.
Since there’s only one actual person involved in fantasy (the one who’s fantasizing), and Biblically, sex requires multiple participants, then masturbation can’t be considered “sex” biblically. There’s simply no precedent for it. We would say it’s a sexual act in the modern parlance, but then so are nocturnal emissions; neither is stated to be a sin. If you don’t have chapter and verse for something being a sin, then it’s dangerous to call it a sin. (I can actually make a strong argument that Christians calling something a sin that isn’t a sin caused many/most of our modern societal problems, but I digress)
Lastly, the Bible never, not even once, uses a word that means “lust”. I talk about this in several articles, but the Greeks didn’t even have a word for it, nor did the Hebrews. They had a word that meant strong desire, but it could be positive or negative, and Jesus applies it to Himself two in once verse. (Luke 22:15) The closest is 1 Cor 7, where marriage is a better alternative to “burning” (implied with desire). For a topic that the Bible doesn’t directly address nor call immoral, Christians seem to spend a lot of time building it up often as a “boogeyman”. Sexual desire isn’t wrong; engaging in sexual activity with another person outside of marriage is wrong.
And as an appeal to wisdom, God literally designed us so that sex was necessary to propagate the species. Further, 3 of the 4 first commands before the fall boil down to “have sex” (necessary to be fruitful, multiply, and fill the Earth) God included an erotic work — Song of Solomon — in the Bible, and bonus trivia: it never mentions God, or anything relating to Him. Maybe, just maybe, sexual desire isn’t ipso facto bad/evil/wrong. To say it is, is again sliding into Gnosticism.
I apologize if I sound rude, but were you going to reply to my comment about solo masturbation being literally sex done outside the confines of marriage, or did you want me to comment it somewhere else.
I apologize if I’m bugging you, I’m just a bit confused, you don’t need to reply if you don’t want to.
Sorry, I just got a little busy over the past few days. I absolutely intend to reply when I have more time for a thoughtful response. 🙂
No worries, It’s alright, I was just curious. You’re good 😀
I wanted to leave you at least one more comment so you can know that I read your reply. I probably won’t make another comment. if I comment again it will be in your article about masturbation
Thank you for replying, what you’re saying is that if the Bible doesn’t condemn something, it’s probably fine. I agree with what you say in your comment
It’s so wierd for me, because I think i have anxiety about this still. I’ve done a crazy amount of research on the topic, but I still feel very anxious about it, in spite of there being more evidence that supports masturbation than against it. There really is a lot of Neo Platonist influince in this topic in particular, and people act like it’s un-bliblical it’s crazy.
If I had to guess other reasons why, it could be because:
-I have a very empathetic personality and don’t want to hurt others, so something like fantasy, even the Song of Solomon, can make me fear I’m being selfish or rude toward someone.
-Growing up in western culture that constantly demonizes sex, but then finding out that, masturbation, something the culture constantly says is bad, actually isn’t actually bad, is sending me for a huge shock that
I’m having a hard time adjusting to it. Just the fact that most of western sexual ideas about purity are gnostic ideas projected onto the Bible is pretty wild.
-Fear of the small chance I MIGHT be disobeying God, so I end up trying to over-analyze things so I don’t disobey him.Especially since there’s a verse about how fornicators won’t enter heaven, but you’ve given evidence that fornication is probably not masturbation according to the Bible
-I see a lot of women online talk about how their former husbands/boyfriends acted extremely selfish and didn’t pay attention toward their needs and acted stupidly abusive toward them. On the opposite end, I read stories about women cheating on their husbands and then the husbands feel really shocked and sad. people playing down their spouses needs and making them feel really bad is not very good. I think about how Christ wants us to love and be kind toward one another, and not be selfish toward others, so I’m concerned masturbation with fantasy could lead to someone acting very selfish and put their own needs above others. Maybe I just don’t get the social aspects of sex in general, because it’s hard for me to imagine being sexual towards someone for my own pleasure and equate that with acting Christ like, in spite of sex not being condemned in the Bible. I know that masturbation is not done with someone else, so in a real life setting where there’s another person, this probably wouldn’t apply because I WOULD be concerned about another persons needs above my own. I guess just doing something like masturbation wierds me out currently, despite it not being sinful according to biblical standards. Like you said, the Biblical laws and commands about sex aren’t what gnosticism is like
I’m not really a fan of trying to rationalize everything like Platonists due, and put my own human reasoning above scripture either. Thank you for talking again. There definitely is something to be said about a lot of stuff in our culture being labeled as boogeyman. Thanks again for your responses, I realize a lot of what I’m saying might have absolutely nothing to do with my original request and is more like projection, but thank you.
For your Mosaic Law article.
I understand that the OT law (613 ish commands that God gave to Moses) were divided up into 3 categories by Thomas Aquinas and later John Calvin as Civil, Ceremonial, Moral.
I understand that we are no longer bound to the Civil or Ceremonial laws but that God’s Moral law is the same yesterday, today and forever as God’s morality never changes and thus still applies to us today.
What I have not been able to find is where these 613 do’s and don’ts have been divided up into the categories and which ones fall into the Moral category specifically.
I have seen others ask the question on the internet but I have yet to find an answer. Your thoughts?
The divisions are merely a convenient way to think about the law, not a “hard and fast rule”. I would say we aren’t “bound” by any of the law, but as you pointed out, God’s moral law has never changed. Romans 15:4 tells us that it’s all useful for instruction, and the law does give moral instruction. I try side step the whole issue with this understanding. That is, I don’t need to worry which of the three a specific law is because I recognize that it’s all useful for instruction. (though again, we don’t have to obey the Mosaic Law) For example, all the ceremonial washings do actually communicate moral lessons sometimes, like how we are supposed pure and without sin, even accidental sin. I think this more holistic approach is better than trying to sort out which laws belong to which category, and then discarding whole categories as not useful. So the question isn’t “Should I obey this law because it’s a moral law?”, it’s “What can I learn from this law?”
(P.S. and yes, I know I’ve mentioned those divisions on this website before, because again, they are a convenient way to talk about things.)
I’ve actually decided to comment here again as I’m talking about something different. I’ve debated whether or not to comment about anti-natalism, but I thought it would be a good idea to because it’s’ a topic not covered by a lot of Christians. I also do not agree with anti-natalism(All those who hate me love death)Proverbs 8:36), as I believe it’s very similar to gnosticism, I am just commenting some questions I have.
Yes, I am fully aware that God commanded all life to have sex But is it worth constantly perpetuating suffering of everyone else? I’m not sure it’s really a good thing to constantly have children and subject them to suffering when we can just, not have any children. Nobody has to have cancer or be subjected to the pain of death, or face any suffering if they aren’t born in the first place.
Celibacy in the New Testament is also highly encouraged over Marriage. (Jesus’s’ comments about eunuchs and people leaving their families having greater reward, “Blessed are the barren” Luke 23:29, Paul encouraging people to not have children due to his beliefs about the end the world happening in his lifetime 1 Corinthians 7:29-30).
If universal reconciliation isn’t real, it would be extremely risky to have children and risk them going to suffer for eternity. When there’s a trillion different doctrines, people can have different ways of thinking that aren’t Christian, people can twist scripture for their own agenda, there’s so many different doctrines and ideas in the world that subjecting them to potentially doing what God doesn’t want them to do and giving them no guarantee of life eternal in the next is extremely not smart. It would not be good to roll the dice and potentially subject someone to hell.
Also, people born with disabilities potentially not being able to be in control of their own actions or just be so disabled they can’t do anything. Examples: people with ADHD really struggle with executive functioning which hampers their ability to do stuff and some people can have psychotic symptoms that can make them just full on murderers, Schizophrenic people can have unrealistic delusions and hallucinations that affect their actions, and some people can just be born in vegetable like states
A friend of mine thinks that people have to be either brainwashed or sociopaths to subject someone to death and gets confused about Baby showers, because the person that gets born has to be subject to cancer and sickness. He doesn’t get why people want to constantly cause death and suffering
Even though I am not anti-natalist, It’s difficult for me to think the point of having children if it’s highly discouraged in the new testament to be married and only if you “burn with desire”. and I REALLY don’t want to subject someone to suffer for eternity or do all the research I’ve been doing to make sure I don’t do something or act in an evil way that displeases God. I know the important thing is to fear God and keep his commandments and God doesn’t think having children is evil, I’m just questioning things and praying. I apologize if I made anyone reading this feel bad.
Thank you for any replies, God Bless and have a blessed day
So, I think almost everything in your 3rd paragraph is entirely wrong. Jesus said that not all could accept being “eunuchs” (unmarried, and literally “alone in bed”), but only to whom it was given. The implication is it’s rare. Jesus’s “Blessed are the barren” is a reference to the judgement coming on Jerusalem in 70 AD, which was indeed terrible and involved cannibalism. (Yes, it was that bad). Paul didn’t think the world world end in his lifetime, he was talking about an “impending distress”, meaning it was something that was coming soon, not something applicable to all Christians for all time. There were prophecies about such things in the early church, and of course they came true, which makes this a prophetic thing, not a “for all Christians for all time” thing.
And don’t forget:
After being married, having children is one of the best predictors of happiness. More importantly, “be fruitful, multiply, and fill the earth” was commanded to Adam, Noah, and Noah’s sons. God obviously doesn’t think having children is evil, and in fact commanded it knowing how evil things could become. If “hell” is real, then God still obviously commanded us to have children knowing it was a possibility, so it can’t be wrong or even a bad idea. The same applies to disabilities and such. Further, no children disqualifies one from church leadership according to 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1.
(Slightly more personally, I have been clinically diagnosed with ADHD and have had it my entire life. While it does come with downsides, I wouldn’t trade my slightly unusual brain for anything.)
I don’t think you realize it, but you’re effectively saying that God made a mistake when he told use to fill the Earth. While perhaps not every man is called to have a wife/children (as Jesus mentioned), that’s what God wants for most of us. (The drives to survive and procreate are two of our strongest desires for a reason.) Satan would like nothing better than to empty the Earth of mankind contrary to the direct command of God, which places anti-natalism firmly on the side of evil, not good.
I wasn’t implying that God made a mistake when He commanded us to be fruitful and multiply. I was trying to state the main argument of anti-natalism which is basically: if you’re never born, you don’t suffer, and suffering is bad, especially that which one has not control over like disease and death. There where also some Bible verses in the New Testament I thought sounded discouraging of having children, which you have addressed. I also just remembered that Ecclesiastes 4:3 says “But better off then the dead or the living is the one who never existed who has never seen the evil activity under the sun.” There were some what I believed to be conflicting messages in regards to whether or not people should have children or not. There are also a minority of anti-natalists who use certain verses from the Bible like the one I just quoted to support their views. I was more confused about anti-natalism from a biblical perspective because of stuff like Gehenna, potentially conflicting messages, and was looking for more biblical answers. You’re probably right in that the Bible is more pro-natalist than anti-natalist as there are more verses for the former than the latter. Thank you for addressing my comments and pointing out that I unknowingly implied that God made a mistake telling everyone to have children again.
I feel the need to write some more because it’s’ relevant to other things I have asked and I do a lot of research into the Bible and History as a hobby.I myself have Aspergers and I get conflicting messages about accepting yourself for who God made you to be and verses in the Bible that say passion is bad(Colossians 3:1-8). As someone with Aspergers, verses that talk about self abasement can make me feel bad about myself(I know Colossians 3 isn’t about self abasement.) I have a lot of special interests and hobbies that wouldn’t exactly be considered to be productive(not sinful). I end up feeling bad about myself because I really would like to be able to be less “passionate” about my special interests, but my autism symptoms makes it a lot more difficult for me to. I don’t think God made any mistakes in making me have autism, I just more or less feel a bit confused on how I should behave. I’m Glad God made me the way I am in spite of my internal conflicts.
I have spent a lot of time on Bible Study and Academic research, because I am very hyper vigilant trying to be Biblical and please God. I get pretty fearful about enjoying my hobbies and want to make sure I’m not sinning against God because of a fear I have that if I’m not following God’s word accurately, I’m giving people false information and may be punished for being wrong, or I’m doing something wrong. I want to make sure I’m pleasing God in everything, even in my special interests and fixations. I also can get a bit confused. Another reason I do research is because, when I first started researching Bible Scholarship online, I found out that people end up projecting their own modern cultural values and beliefs onto the Bible(Like Platonism and Feminism), and want to make sure I’m doing what the Bible wants and not what culture wants.
So with comments about sex in the Bible, me being socially awkward and wanting to make sure I’m being super accurate with these things so I don’t end up doing “sexual immorality” that may not let me inherit the kingdom of God is pretty important. The recent online debates about which Christian detonations is the correct one (orthodox, protestant and catholic) aren’t helping things either. Although I think there’s more evidence against Orthodoxy and Catholicism, I can still get pretty anxious about being accurate to God’s word in my life and sharing it with others. The internet can also be a pretty big source of misinformation, so it’s important to fact check things and to be accurate so you don’t end up spreading false information everywhere(I reach out to the academics themselves as well). The nature of Bible Scholarship using Methodological Naturalism also isn’t really a guarantee of interpretations being the most accurate interpretation. In Bible Scholarship, it’s the most likely interpretation that has more evidence to support it than other interpretations, but Scholars can end up being wrong about things or project their bias. I want to try to be accurate Especially since the articles that you’ve written are a bit more liberal(not liberal from a Biblical perspective) than what western culture is used to, I think it’s super important to be detailed in what’s okay and what isn’t. I brought up the academic article “Can a Man Commit Pornea with his Wife” because it challenged what you said about sex in the Bible.
This stuff I’m sharing about my Autism and Researching Biblical stuff is also is relevant to my questions on anti-natilism because I just think about all the research that one has to do to make sure they’re being 100% accurate to God’s word and to make sure they aren’t sinning or doing evil toward anyone and that people could be born into having to deal with the possibility that, in spite of their efforts, they’re doing something really evil that God doesn’t like.
There’s probably a lot of un-biblical self hatred in what I’m stating. I think your final comment about me implying that God made a mistake when commanding us to have children made me realize that I think I unintentionally adopted an un-biblical view. The un-biblical view was that people are bad for having disabilities, but God loves them, and He doesn’t make mistakes. I think that thinking that someone is bad because they are disabled may be more of a gnostic or western thing. I don’t think that God made any mistakes when making people different, and like you said, people’s differences in their brain can also have positive benefits as well, I think
When I told that with my friend, He responded by telling me he doesn’t think gnosticism is to blame for a lot of bad behaviors, because people in other cultures can do evil things toward each other like canabalize someone. He also told me that a 14yo was suing someone at McDonalds for being raped by someone, then followed up with a sarcastic comment “humanity is a good species”.
I’ll try to follow up anything else through either email or commenting somewhere else as I don’t think it would be good to clog up the request and prayer post with all the stuff I’m posting.
Thank you again for reading and responding to my previous comment.
An article on the history of sola fide, starting with the early church fathers, extending through to the Reformation would be interesting. I’m curious as to when the Catholic Church strayed from scripture and began teaching faith + cooperation, and how they handled dissenters prior to the Reformation (I imagine warmly). God bless.
There is a verse in the NASB that differs from the NKJV, John 1:18, Begotten God or Begotten Son. Just wondering why the big difference. Which is correct?
Fundamentally, it’s not a huge difference in meaning since Jesus is God, but the reason they read differently is because there’s a textual variant there. For more information on textual variatns in general, see my article on the topic: Majority Text vs. Critical Text vs. Textus Receptus – Textual Criticism 101. For more information on that specific variant, you can try this article. If you don’t know much about textual variants, I recommend that read my article first for context; obviously that’s up to you though.
Thank you for the information. I actually read the first article just today before I came here to see if there was a response to my question.
I do believe I was lead to this site for a purpose.
Hi,
It’s a good idea from you to get requests for new articles, thanks for the opportunity.
It would be great to have an article to get an idea of the different dates that are proposed for the date Jesus was born, and to see which ones are closer to reality.
One date that particularly springs to mind was proposed by Ernst L. Martin in his work The Star of Bethlehem (free online, https://www.askelm.com/star/star006.htm) in which a precise date is given day/month/year, based on astronomical data, from the above link 4th para before the end.
Oddly enough, this book was written before “the event” took place, you’ll know what event I’m talking about when you see the date.
What is your opinion on the proposed date from Ernst L. Martin?
Thanks,
Nick
Oddly enough, I have recently been considering looking into this. In fact, my mother recently mentioned that she’d heard a convincing argument that Jesus was born sometime in September, though she couldn’t remember where she’d read it. This seems an awful lot like what she found, which I tried to find and didn’t, so thank you for sharing. This will probably be a “back burner” article, but I’m certainly interested enough to add it to the list; thank you for sharing the link. 🙂
I’m wondering if this movement ‘Christian nationalistism’ is biblical? Are we to incorporate politics and religion? I don’t see any support for it in scripture. Thanks, all praises to the Lord.
That depends greatly on how you define the term.
Thank you for the response.
Article idea: Did the Old Testament patriarchs wait a few years after a child was born before giving it a name? The way I heard it, this was done to determine a child’s character, and therefore give him or her an appropriate name (Leah might be an example of this). Furthermore (again, the way I heard it), husbands could rename their wives! In fact, if husbands could rename their wives, it might give them a strong incentive to avoid contention, as they might receive a “bad name”! Also, would this have any bearing on Simon being named “Peter”?
Gen 21:3, Gen 25:24-25, and Gen 35:18 seem to indicate that the naming happened right away, and the end of Gen 29 and beginning of 30 seem to indicate that the mothers named the children some of the time. So I don’t think think the theory that they waited a long time holds any water. I’m unaware of any husband renaming his wife, and Sarah’s name change was instituted by God, not Abraham.
I guess I should have clarified by saying “Old Testament era”, since, as you said, this did not happen in Scripture. Anyway, it was probably a cultural thing, if anything at all. It was simply a theory a friend of mine had. I thought it was interesting. Thanks for looking into it!
I was wondering if if a follower of Christ has to attend church. I know the verses that say don’t forsake the fellowship and so on but what I’m finding the churches that I’ve been to are missing something they’re either focused on speaking in tongues, the sermons are meatless, some watered down stories that’s about it. So I guess I’m wondering would the medium of the internet be considered Fellowship?
So, the Greek word typically translated “church” literally means go out of your home and assemble with others.
You already know the verses, so I don’t think I need to comment more. Where to go can be an issue though, I understand that. I couldn’t find a church in my area either until someone else prayer for me, and then I found one the next week. (where I still attend.) So, I would pray about it that God would lead you someplace, and ask others to pray for you as well.
Things I’d like to see you cover, since I generally (although not always) agree with you!
– The Jews (various issues/concerns) – this might lose you all your subscribers, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make 😀
– Once-saved-always-saved (OSAS). Because I’m still undecided.
– More “the evils of feminism” type stuff. The boat thing was great, I often link/refer to it. Wifey likes it too.
– Maybe another “divorce & remarriage” kinda thing. Still not decided on that either. Or maybe I just have to re-read the first one!
I’m planning to do some research into “replacement theology” at some point to decide where I land, it’s lower on the priority list though. For OSAS, You might be interested this series of mine (link is to the intro), as that harmonizes almost every single verse perfectly. 🙂 I don’t have much more to say on the evils of feminism than what I’ve previously published, or at least, not much that would be useful. Similarly, I don’t know that I have more to say about divorce and remarriage than my article on the topic. If you have a specific question, I can try to answer it though.
I would add to those other two people and request an investigation into the old Testament law (the Testaments perhaps create a division in our mind that shouldn’t be there). The Sabbath, the Holy Days, the food laws, etc. I think a fairly strong case can be made from Hebrews that the old priestly and perhaps sacrificial system has been superceded by the new priesthood, but there’re major issues with trying to get rid of other things, tying them to covenants, or say they no longer apply. I enjoy you articles and they have changed my understanding of marriage and divorce significantly, though I still have a lot of study to do for myself. If you look at the blog I’m sharing, all the articles by myself do not reflect these recent studies, so make of that what you will. I’d love to open an email discourse!
Funny you should mention the sacrificial system, since there was a slight change of plans on the PSA series and the next article that comes out will almost certainly be on the levitical sacrificial system. Not in depth (for me), but more a “deep overview” to see if it points to PSA. Once you understand the whole thing, the fulfillment in Jesus just slaps you in the face.
I’m glad the website has been helpful. 🙂 If you’d like to talk via email, you can find mine on the contact page. If you’d prefer to chat, I have a discord for patrons. (I’d open it up further, but too many people would mean I’d run even further behind on work/writing)
hi
I’ve enjoyed reading your series about marriage and the proper order of gender relationships, so I’d be more than happy to hear more from you about that. While I’ve seen many others write with more or less the same position (patriarchal headship), many fall into the trap of degrading one gender and/or enforcing rules and regulations that go beyond biblical commands, so your take on the issues has been very refreshing.
I’ve noticed on the list of articles in the series that a couple of them are just text without links. One of them I’m pretty sure is just unfinished (Biblically, What’s the Role of Men is Society and Marriage?), but the other one I remember reading and is now unavailable (Gender and Attraction: What Men vs Women REALLY Want). Did you take it down yourself, and are you planning on fixing or reposting it?
On a related note, do you still plan on making an addendum on your article about Polygyny? You brought up the question about threesomes towards the end of it, and have made related statements about bisexuality in women and why it’s apparently not condemned in the Bible (based on Greek definitions of sexual intercourse). You’ve hinted at it in both that article and your other one about the true meaning of Romans 1:26, mostly in the comment sections. I’m rather eager to see your full answer, since I don’t think it’s unfair to say that those are pretty controversial claims, but from what I’ve seen on this site, you’re certainly not afraid of controversy.
I’m glad you enjoyed them. 🙂
I did take down the one article pending an edit, since someone told me it was being used to support some very immoral things. I wanted to address those things in the article so it would more clearly argue against those things, but not address them quite as directly because I also don’t want to put it into anyone’s head. However, but have been very busy. I do plan to put it back up, and I’ll try for soon, maybe check in a couple of days. No promises though, sadly. The other articles that are text but not links are merely unfinished.
About threesomes, here’s the short answer: I see no reason why a man who had two wives couldn’t take both to bed at the same time. I further don’t see why they should be prohibited from sexual contact with each other, since scripture never seems to forbid it anywhere. (For others reading this, my treatment of homosexuality, including Romans 1:26, can be found here.) This is something of an “argument from silence”, since there’s no prohibition. I don’t want to say “though shalt not” unless I have chapter and verse for it. Interestingly, there’s anecdotal evidence that intimacy (including of a non-sexual kind) between two wives seems to significantly reduce friction in a polygamous household.
Are you ever going to address how a biblically polygamous society is supposed to solve the Lost Boys (or whatever other term you want to use for surplus unmarried men) problem?
Short version: it’s worse in monogamy-only societies once feminism has matured. (Which always happens in monogamy-only societies) Polygyny creates a long-term smaller imbalance. Monogamy-only perfectly balances things for a while, but after feminism rears its ugly head, you end up with far more men who can’t get women than you do in a polygynous society. It’s this way in the West today, and definitely in America. I have lots of data on this, but likely won’t turn it into an article for quite some time because I’m busy with other things, like the PSA series, which is is more important in my opinion.
More importantly, it’s irrelevant. For Christians, our primary concern should be what God wants. We should pursue that first, regardless of the consequences.
Go away, Eric.
While I recognize from your article that the Bible is silent on female/female sexuality, I’m still a little confused by how women in a polygynous household can be “intimate” with each other. Biblical marriage is defined as between a man and a woman, so biblical polygyny seems better defined as multiple marriages rather than one group marriage. If the wives were to have sexual contact with each other (with or without their husband present), wouldn’t that be going against the marriage covenant they each made with the the husband?
That depends on what that covenant is. These days, we tend to assume that a woman being intimate with another woman is just as much wrong/cheating as a woman committing adultery with a man, but based on what? Scripture is extremely clear that a married woman engaging in sexual activity with another man is abhorrent. Why doesn’t it say the same about a man who has two wives? Without a verse to prohibit it, adding “thus saith the Lord” to a prohibition seems like adding to his prohibitions to me. I won’t do that.
Additionally, women are wired to be significantly more bisexual than men are because of their biology. (Serotonin regulates bisexuality, with lower serotonin = more bisexual, and women have far less than men) Given that the way God wired women makes them far more likely to be bisexual, and that it’s never prohibited, that seems like a good clue.
[Comment deleted by Admin]
Eric, for personal attacks, advocating that we ignore God/Scripture (even though we agree on the commands), and attempting to convince others to commit serious sin — and doing those all over this website — you’ve lost the privilege of posting comments on this website. You’re only the second person I banned, and I banned the first for almost identical reasons. I will delete any comments you post here. Please, examine yourself, seek God, and repent, because the wrath of God is revealed against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, the men suppressing the truth by unrighteousness, but if you confess your sin, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from every unrighteousness.
Go away, Eric.